Skip to content

Verified cloud accounts across 14 providers. Secure handover with every order.

Cloud guide

Deploying for Asia-Pacific Users

Latency to Asia-Pacific is a physics problem. Here is how the providers compare on coverage there.

Distance sets the floor

A request from Singapore to a server in Virginia crosses roughly halfway around the planet. The round trip cannot be optimised below what the speed of light allows, and for an application making several sequential calls that adds up to a visibly slower experience.

If a meaningful share of your users are in Asia-Pacific, compute needs to be there. No amount of caching fixes a dynamic request that has to cross an ocean.

Alibaba Cloud has the deepest regional coverage

Alibaba Cloud’s regional presence across Asia-Pacific is broader than any western provider’s, and its service catalogue mirrors the hyperscalers with ECS compute, OSS storage, ApsaraDB and the PAI machine-learning platform.

The trade-offs are practical rather than technical: English-language documentation is less consistent, and account setup involves additional verification steps compared with western providers.

The hyperscalers all have a presence

AWS, Google Cloud and Azure all operate multiple Asia-Pacific regions covering Singapore, Tokyo, Sydney, Mumbai and others. Coverage is good and the tooling is the same as everywhere else, which is a real advantage for a team that already knows the platform.

Note that Asia-Pacific regions are frequently priced higher than North American or European ones on the same provider, sometimes noticeably.

Developer clouds cover the major hubs

DigitalOcean has Singapore and Bangalore, Linode covers Singapore, Tokyo, Mumbai and Sydney, and UpCloud and Kamatera both have Asia-Pacific locations.

For a straightforward application server serving the region, these are usually cheaper than a hyperscaler and entirely adequate.

Mainland China is a separate problem

Serving users inside mainland China is not the same as serving Asia-Pacific. Cross-border network conditions are unpredictable, and hosting content served to users in China generally requires an ICP filing, which in turn requires a local business entity.

This is a regulatory and administrative project rather than a technical one, and it should be scoped as such before committing to a launch date.

A workable pattern

  1. Put compute in the region closest to the largest concentration of users.
  2. Serve static assets from a CDN with Asia-Pacific points of presence.
  3. Keep the database in the same region as the application, not across an ocean from it.
  4. Measure real latency from where your users are rather than trusting a region map.

Accounts on the platforms discussed here: Buy Alibaba Cloud Accounts, Buy AWS Accounts, Buy Google Cloud Accounts.

Accounts on the platforms discussed here, with every configuration and price published up front:

Further reading

Official documentation

Provider behaviour, quotas and pricing are defined by the platform itself. These are the first-party references for the services discussed above:

Frequently asked questions

Alibaba Cloud has the broadest regional coverage. For teams already fluent in a hyperscaler, that platform's Asia-Pacific regions are usually the pragmatic choice.

Only for static content. Dynamic requests still travel to the origin, so compute location continues to matter.

It is possible but unpredictable. Serving China properly usually requires in-country hosting and an ICP filing.

Keep reading

Browse verified cloud accounts

Fourteen providers, each with its own configurations and published pricing.

Scroll to Top
0 selected Compare